Project Engagements.

When METRC, the POS, and the ERP stop talking to each other, on-hand inventory drifts. The 30-day reconciliation 4 CCR § 15051 requires becomes harder to run, the 5% significance threshold in § 15034 becomes easier to cross, and citations follow. We rebuild the data pipeline so reconciliation happens once, automatically, and stays auditable — with a named owner and a backup who can both run it.

• Audit current METRC, POS, and ERP data flow; identify discrete failure points.
• Rebuild the integration and reconciliation workflow against actual operational practice.
• Weekly three-way reconciliation SOP (METRC, physical, financial) with a named owner and documented backup.
• Designated Account Manager training and credentialing where needed.
• 30-day post-implementation follow-up audit to confirm the system holds.

A working reconciliation process, written SOPs, training certifications for the team running it, and a post-implementation report confirming the fix is operating in production.

When a DCC inspector reads your Master Manufacturing Procedures first and a documentation gap walks them straight to a section 17214–17216 citation, the fix is a foundational rebuild. We map every product family, build the procedures the operation actually needs, and stay through three weeks of rollout to make sure the team adopts what we wrote.

• One to two site visits to map every product family across formulations and SKUs.
• Master Manufacturing Procedures (MMPs) for each formulation, written to current DCC standards.
• Batch Production Record (BPR) templates per product family.
• Product Quality Plan per product family — hazards identified, release criteria specified.
• Sanitation plan covering cleaning, allergen control, and pest management.
• Training materials for production staff, written for the actual role.
• Three weeks of shadow-operation support during rollout.

A complete document set, training records, and a 30-day check-in to confirm the documents match what's actually happening on the production floor.

Most Right-of-Access citations don't come from broken processes — they come from a team that wasn't ready for the moment an inspector walked in. We run a full mock audit, train the team through three rounds of role-plays across multiple shifts, and leave them with a defensible checklist owned by the General Manager.

• Full-day onsite mock audit conducted as a regulator would conduct it.
• Premises diagram review, and update if the documentation diverges from the floor.
• Records audit across track-and-trace, surveillance retention, employee files, and training records.
• Staff role-plays — three rounds, multiple shifts, every role that touches an inspector.
• Right-of-Access training for front-of-house and operations staff.
• Defensible inspection checklist owned by the GM and visible to ownership.
• 30-day post-sprint Q&A window.

A team that performs under inspection pressure, updated documentation that survives a regulator's read, and a written readiness report leadership can show their board or capital partners.

When an annual license is denied, the operator has a finite window to fix the cited issues, build the narrative, and re-apply. We project-manage the fix end to end and coordinate with the local jurisdiction. Offered when the right operator walks in — not what we lead with.

• Decompose the denial letter section by section against the underlying regulation.
• Build the remediation plan in dependency order — fix what must precede what.
• Project-manage the fixes across CEQA, local authorization, premises, and SOPs.
• Local jurisdiction coordination through the re-application window.
• Re-application narrative drafting, anchored to remediation evidence.
• Submit and follow through to decision.

A re-application package the DCC can approve, plus the underlying compliance posture to defend the next inspection — not a paper victory that collapses on the first walk-through.